Summary of reviews on GravField WIP

• 关于技术实现部分的意见 Comments on technical implementation

  • 增加技术实现的描述
  • 运行时实现和技术描述有些模糊 - 说明技术设计和技术实现
  • 说明现场coder如何参与和互动，展示编程工作界面

• 关于内容的意见 Comment on the content

  • coder的角色是什么不明确，需要说清楚：
    • 他们是背景吗？
    • coder的互动怎样参与？怎样影响玩家？
  • 回答：这种沉浸是更具认知性还是更具技术导向性？比该领域的先前研究更具新颖性和原创性的原因是什么？如果是认知性的话，那么可以探索”现象学的设计空间practical design space of phenomenology“ 。
  • 补完作者自己在WIP中提出的问题和需要增加的内容

• 对未来工作的建议 Future work suggestion

  • 探索沉浸者的全身IK追踪能力，更自然的动作
  • coder用MR编程而不是依赖MacBook

Reviewer 3 (1AC)

Overall Rating

I strongly suggest that this work-in-progress submission is accepted.

Required Comments on Overall Rating:

The paper presents interesting research in the field of inter-body interactions that is relevant for this conference. The research is technically sound and well explained, the writing is clear. However there are some minor clarifications that can be added (see feedback to authors).

本文介绍了与本次会议相关的体间相互作用领域的有趣研究。研究在技术上是可靠的，并且解释得很好，写作也很清晰。然而，有一些小的澄清可以补充（见给作者的反馈）。

Meta-Review

Reviewers agree that this is an interesting paper of good quality, with R2 noting how well the contribution to knowlege is explanined.R1 notes that the technical implementation is somewhat unclear. AC1 notes how the live coders interactions could be better explained.Overall the reviewers are in agreement that this is a good work-in-progress parper which is relevant for this conference.

审稿人一致认为这是一篇有趣且质量不错的论文，R2特别指出了对知识贡献的解释非常清晰。R1指出技术实现有些不明确。AC1提到可以更好地解释现场编码员的互动。总体来说，审稿人一致认为这是一篇适合本次会议的良好在研论文。

Relevance